[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8f3aa8d60809271307o1c306eccm5571670090218ab9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:07:14 -0700
From: "Martin Bligh" <mbligh@...igh.org>
To: "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Mathieu Desnoyers" <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
"David Wilder" <dwilder@...ibm.com>, hch@....de,
"Martin Bligh" <mbligh@...gle.com>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@...radead.org>,
"Masami Hiramatsu" <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
"Steven Rostedt" <srostedt@...hat.com>,
"Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9] Unified trace buffer
>> that's even worse i think :-/ And this isnt bikeshed-painting really,
>> the RNGBF_ name hurts my eyes and RB_ is definitely confusing to read.
>> (as the rbtree constants are in capitals as well and similarly named)
>>
>> RING_TYPE_PADDING
>>
>> or:
>>
>> RINGBUF_TYPE_PADDING
>>
>> yes, it's longer, but still, saner.
>
> I don't mind the extra typing, it is just a bit more difficult to keep in
> the 80 character line limit.
Would using tb_ (trace buffer) rather than rb_ help ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists