[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080927203427.GD28937@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 22:34:27 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Martin Bligh <mbligh@...igh.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
David Wilder <dwilder@...ibm.com>, hch@....de,
Martin Bligh <mbligh@...gle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9] Unified trace buffer
* Martin Bligh <mbligh@...igh.org> wrote:
> >> that's even worse i think :-/ And this isnt bikeshed-painting really,
> >> the RNGBF_ name hurts my eyes and RB_ is definitely confusing to read.
> >> (as the rbtree constants are in capitals as well and similarly named)
> >>
> >> RING_TYPE_PADDING
> >>
> >> or:
> >>
> >> RINGBUF_TYPE_PADDING
> >>
> >> yes, it's longer, but still, saner.
> >
> > I don't mind the extra typing, it is just a bit more difficult to keep in
> > the 80 character line limit.
>
> Would using tb_ (trace buffer) rather than rb_ help ?
excellent idea ...
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists