| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20080927221313.GA24032@informatik.uni-freiburg.de> Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 00:13:14 +0200 From: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...ormatik.uni-freiburg.de> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: reformating of MAINTAINERS Hello, I rebased my changes to MAINTAINERS to Linus' current HEAD. In the meantime I'm not convinced anymore that restoring the alphabetic ordering is still worth the effort[1] because I work on decentralizing the info contained in that file. But I still think that merging P and M is sensible. So I changed the order of my commits to have the alphabetic order commit the topmost one. So now there are two branches, maintainers and maintainers-fixes that only differ in that one commit. git://git.breakpoint.cc/ukleinek/linux-2.6 maintainers resp. git://git.breakpoint.cc/ukleinek/linux-2.6 maintainers-alphabetic It's gitweb browsable at http://git.breakpoint.cc/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=ukleinek/linux-2.6;a=summary @Linus: Do you like it? Do you consider pulling in the merge window? Best regards Uwe [1] I don't mean to actually fix the ordering, because this is done by an already existing script, but it might result in merge conflicts. -- Uwe Kleine-König Set the I_WANT_A_BROKEN_PS environment variable to force BSD syntax ... -- manpage of procps -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists