lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 27 Sep 2008 12:20:31 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	david@...g.hm
Cc:	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	malware-list@...ts.printk.net, arjan@...radead.org,
	bunk@...nel.org, tytso@....edu, tvrtko.ursulin@...hos.com,
	hch@...radead.org, andi@...stfloor.org, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk,
	peterz@...radead.org, Jonathan.Press@...com, riel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] 0/11 fanotify: fscking all notifiction and file access
 system (intended for antivirus scanning and file indexers)

> sending a message out for every READ/WRITE seems like it will generate a 
> LOT of messages, and very few will be ones that anyone cares about.

On read there isn't much point anyway, on write if you simply send one,
save an event counter number and don't send another until the last one is
cleared it all works well. When the last event is cleared if another
event has occurred then the event counter will have changed so you know
to send one immediately, if the app doesn't want to receive them for a
while it can just hang onto the event for a minute or two before clearing
it.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ