[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200809281035.06547.arvidjaar@newmail.ru>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 10:34:58 +0400
From: Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@...mail.ru>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Ghost EDD devices in /sys again
On Sunday 07 September 2008, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> I think this is closer to what we really want; after all, memory being written is the "first principles" test that applies here.
>
OK I have been using this for some time. I do not actually insist on
returning "failure" for zero signature; my main concern was duplicated
signature resulted from not clearing read buffer. Still I assume that
zero signature is the same as no signature; i.e. even if disk is physically
present but zeroed out there is no point in presenting mbr_signature in
sysfs either.
View attachment "fix-edd-detection-v2" of type "text/x-diff" (1132 bytes)
Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists