[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48DF9EDA.1060809@zytor.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 08:12:26 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@...mail.ru>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Ghost EDD devices in /sys again
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> On Sunday 07 September 2008, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> I think this is closer to what we really want; after all, memory being written is the "first principles" test that applies here.
>>
>
> OK I have been using this for some time. I do not actually insist on
> returning "failure" for zero signature; my main concern was duplicated
> signature resulted from not clearing read buffer. Still I assume that
> zero signature is the same as no signature; i.e. even if disk is physically
> present but zeroed out there is no point in presenting mbr_signature in
> sysfs either.
>
Right, I think that's a much better patch.
The really Right Thing[TM] to do is probably to pre-clear the buffer and
then look for the 0xaa55 signature at offset 510; it is required for
sector 0 to be a valid MBR-format partition table and hence for the MBR
*signature* to be valid.
I'll write that up tomorrow (I'm travelling today), or you can send me a
patch.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists