[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48E1EF0E.8030006@keyaccess.nl>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 11:19:10 +0200
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
Adam Belay <abelay@....edu>, Avuton Olrich <avuton@...il.com>,
Karl Bellve <karl.bellve@...ssmed.edu>,
Willem Riede <wriede@...de.org>,
Matthew Hall <mhall@...omputing.net>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] PNP: don't check disabled PCI BARs for conflicts
in quirk_system_pci_resources()
On 29-09-08 21:13, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2008, Rene Herman wrote:
>> I believe the possible issue is that resources that do _not_ (seem to) start
>> at zero might also be disabled.
>
> But that is irrelevant.
>
> If we have registered them in the resource tree, then PnP must ignore
> them.
>
> The fact is, this is not about being enabled or disabled. This is about
> the PnP tree containing resources that we already parsed from the PCI
> stuff, and once we've seen them as PCI resources, there's not really
> anything valuable in the PnP information.
Well, if you say so...
Just did the attached which might match that intention. Please do not
consider this a submission as I've no idea if this is sensible nor if it
actually helps Frans. Just for discussion. Anything here should arrive
through Bjorn.
Rene.
View attachment "quirk_system_pci_resources.diff" of type "text/plain" (2154 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists