[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48E1EE62.3070608@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:16:18 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@...el.com>
CC: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>, Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>, Dan Hecht <dhecht@...are.com>
Subject: Re: Use CPUID to communicate with the hypervisor.
Nakajima, Jun wrote:
> On 9/29/2008 12:37:23 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>
>>> Can this interface be used to pass variable sized data from a
>>> hypervisor to a gust? ACPI or DMI tables for instance.
>>>
>>>
>> In theory it can, but it would be a bad idea. cpuid is best used to
>> communicate cpu features; ACPI and DMI are (mostly) system features.
>>
>
> Also, we have reserved the MSRs from 0x40000000 - 0x400000FF for software use. We could use such MSRs, but what's the benefits of using those when ACPI already defined the detection mechanism?
>
>
Features that the guest needs to enable very early on, before ACPI is
up. I don't think there are many of those.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists