[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080930054151.GA16961@Krystal>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 01:41:51 -0400
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Markers : fix reentrancy
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com> wrote :
> marker_synchronize_unregister must be called _also_ between unregistration
> and destruction the data that unregistration-ed probes need to make sure
> there is no caller executing a probe when it's data is destroyed.
>
Ah, you're right. I looked again through your patch description and I
think using a :
if (entry->rcu_pending)
rcu_barrier_sched();
After each time the markers_mutex is taken would keep the fast
batch registration/unregistration and fix the reentrancy problem.
The following patch should address the problem.
Thanks,
Mathieu
Lai Jiangshan discovered a reentrancy issue with markers. This patch implements
a version of the fix which won't slow down marker batch
registration/unregistration.
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
CC: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>
---
kernel/marker.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
Index: linux-2.6-lttng/kernel/marker.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/kernel/marker.c 2008-09-30 01:29:18.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6-lttng/kernel/marker.c 2008-09-30 01:31:28.000000000 -0400
@@ -674,6 +674,8 @@ int marker_probe_register(const char *na
mutex_lock(&markers_mutex);
entry = get_marker(name);
WARN_ON(!entry);
+ if (entry->rcu_pending)
+ rcu_barrier_sched();
entry->oldptr = old;
entry->rcu_pending = 1;
/* write rcu_pending before calling the RCU callback */
@@ -717,6 +719,8 @@ int marker_probe_unregister(const char *
entry = get_marker(name);
if (!entry)
goto end;
+ if (entry->rcu_pending)
+ rcu_barrier_sched();
entry->oldptr = old;
entry->rcu_pending = 1;
/* write rcu_pending before calling the RCU callback */
@@ -795,6 +799,8 @@ int marker_probe_unregister_private_data
mutex_lock(&markers_mutex);
entry = get_marker_from_private_data(probe, probe_private);
WARN_ON(!entry);
+ if (entry->rcu_pending)
+ rcu_barrier_sched();
entry->oldptr = old;
entry->rcu_pending = 1;
/* write rcu_pending before calling the RCU callback */
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists