[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080930070923.GB30927@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 09:09:23 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Markers : fix reentrancy
* Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca> wrote:
> Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com> wrote :
> > marker_synchronize_unregister must be called _also_ between unregistration
> > and destruction the data that unregistration-ed probes need to make sure
> > there is no caller executing a probe when it's data is destroyed.
> >
>
> Ah, you're right. I looked again through your patch description and I
> think using a :
>
>
> if (entry->rcu_pending)
> rcu_barrier_sched();
>
> After each time the markers_mutex is taken would keep the fast batch
> registration/unregistration and fix the reentrancy problem. The
> following patch should address the problem.
could you please send a delta patch against tip/master? Lai's patch is
already applied and is tested. Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists