[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081002061236.3c71c877@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 06:12:36 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Give kjournald a IOPRIO_CLASS_RT io priority
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 23:55:01 -0700
>
> I've forgotten where that code is now, but I don't think it was ever
> revisited. It should be.
>
> So. Where are these atime updaters getting blocked?
my reproducer is sadly very simple (claws-mail is my mail client that uses maildir)
Process claws-mail (4896) Total: 2829.7 msec
EXT3: Waiting for journal access 2491.0 msec 88.4 %
Writing back inodes 160.9 msec 5.7 %
synchronous write 78.8 msec 3.0 %
is an example of such a trace (this is with patch, without patch the numbers are about 3x bigger)
Waiting for journal access is "journal_get_write_access"
Writing back inodes is "writeback_inodes"
synchronous write is "do_sync_write"
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists