[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081002061433.4e995075@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 06:14:33 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Give kjournald a IOPRIO_CLASS_RT io priority
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 11:45:37 +0200
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> That's a good idea, just bump the priority a little bit. Arjan, did
> you test that out? I'd suggest just trying prio level 0 and still
> using best-effort scheduling. Probably still need the sync marking,
> would be interesting to experiment with though.
I looked at 0 but it appears the 0 is the default for everyone...
if everyone just defaulted to > 0 then yes I would have picked 0.
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists