[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081006213209.GA13072@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 01:32:09 +0400
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
To: Matt Sealey <matt@...esi-usa.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
Li Yang <leoli@...escale.com>, Wang Jian <lark@...ux.net.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pata_of_platform: fix no irq handling
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 03:41:19PM -0500, Matt Sealey wrote:
> There is a simple problem with the patch which is that an "IRQ 0" can and does
> actually exist on a bunch of platforms, at least to the best of my knowledge.
>
> Checking for -1 (which means for definite, no irq at all, because it is
> totally unambiguous, as a -1 IRQ numbering is "impossible") is more correct.
This was discussed years ago.
http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/11/22/159
http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/11/22/227
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@...il.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists