linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pata_of_platform: fix no irq handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <48EABBD3.1010401@kernel.org>
Date:	Tue, 07 Oct 2008 10:30:59 +0900
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	avorontsov@...mvista.com
CC:	Matt Sealey <matt@...esi-usa.com>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, Li Yang <leoli@...escale.com>,
	Wang Jian <lark@...ux.net.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pata_of_platform: fix no irq handling

Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 03:41:19PM -0500, Matt Sealey wrote:
>> There is a simple problem with the patch which is that an "IRQ 0" can and does
>> actually exist on a bunch of platforms, at least to the best of my knowledge.
>>
>> Checking for -1 (which means for definite, no irq at all, because it is
>> totally unambiguous, as a -1 IRQ numbering is "impossible") is more correct.
> 
> This was discussed years ago.
> 
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/11/22/159
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/11/22/227
> 

Would this break any existing platforms?  If so, can those be fixed
together or does it become a much bigger problem that way?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/