linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] rudimentary tracing for Classic RCU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c62985530810090323vd5d08e0haa618ca0cbe0c73f@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 9 Oct 2008 12:23:13 +0200
From:	"Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, rjw@...k.pl,
	dipankar@...ibm.com, tglx@...uxtronix.de, andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rudimentary tracing for Classic RCU

2008/10/9 Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>:
> Hello!
>
> This is a tracing patch for Classic RCU, which creates an "rcu/rcucb"
> file in debugfs.  This patch can be handy when you need to work out
> why RCU is refusing to end the current grace period.
>
> Reading from the file results in something like the following:
>
>        rcu: cur=1129  completed=1128  np=0  s=0
>                0,3,7
>        rcu_bh: cur=-287  completed=-287  np=0  s=0
>
>        online: 0-7


Hi Paul,

Why don't you use the ring-buffer tracing engine?
You will really make your life better by putting it as a tracer in
kernel/trace and by using the relevant API.
That will avoid you to manage the debugfs things, the memory
allocation, the buffer managment.....
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/