[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081009105305.GF24560@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 12:53:05 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...e.hu, rjw@...k.pl, dipankar@...ibm.com,
tglx@...uxtronix.de, andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rudimentary tracing for Classic RCU
> Why don't you use the ring-buffer tracing engine?
Because he doesn't actually need a ring buffer, it's a snapshot in
time.
> You will really make your life better by putting it as a tracer in
> kernel/trace and by using the relevant API.
> That will avoid you to manage the debugfs things, the memory
> allocation, the buffer managment.....
ftrace-of-bork wants to assimilate everything?
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists