[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c62985530810090444k4ee22a45p94d3b61670259d5d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 13:44:38 +0200
From: "Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: "Andi Kleen" <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...e.hu, rjw@...k.pl, dipankar@...ibm.com,
tglx@...uxtronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rudimentary tracing for Classic RCU
2008/10/9 Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>:
>> Why don't you use the ring-buffer tracing engine?
>
> Because he doesn't actually need a ring buffer, it's a snapshot in
> time.
You have the possibility to implement a read callback to not use the
ring buffer.
> ftrace-of-bork wants to assimilate everything?
I just proposed that to unify the tracers.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists