[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48EE4FC4.7070902@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 14:39:00 -0400
From: Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: Jeff Hansen <x@...fhansen.com>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: x86_32 tsc/pit and hrtimers
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2008, Jeff Hansen wrote:
>
>> [HRTIMER]: Add highres=noverify option to bypass clocksource verification
>>
>> This disregards the CLOCK_SOURCE_MUST_VERIFY flag on all clocksources.
>> This is particularly useful on legacy x86_32 systems that have no ACPI,
>> LAPIC, or HPET timers, where only TSC and PIT are available.
>
> While I agree in principle, adding this to highres is the wrong thing
> to do. This is a property of clocksources and not of high resolution
> timer support.
>
> The affected clocksource is TSC and it should go there as a command
> line option e.g. tsc=stable, which in turn clears the
> CLOCK_SOURCE_MUST_VERIFY flag in the tsc clocksource.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
Fair enough, but do you think it's worthwhile to have an option to
disable CLOCK_SOURCE_MUST_VERIFY checking for all timers, or should we
implement this on a case-by-case basis when there's legitimate cause,
like with TSC?
-- Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists