linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Re: x86_32 tsc/pit and hrtimers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0810092118100.3271@apollo>
Date:	Thu, 9 Oct 2008 21:18:53 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>
cc:	Jeff Hansen <x@...fhansen.com>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: x86_32 tsc/pit and hrtimers

On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, Chris Snook wrote:
> 
> Fair enough, but do you think it's worthwhile to have an option to disable
> CLOCK_SOURCE_MUST_VERIFY checking for all timers, or should we implement this
> on a case-by-case basis when there's legitimate cause, like with TSC?

Case-by-case is preferred.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/