linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] SIGWINCH problem with terminal apps still alive

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:01:25 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Bodo Eggert <7eggert@....de>
Cc:	Adam Tla__ka <atlka@...gda.pl>, 7eggert@....de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...l.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] SIGWINCH problem with terminal apps still alive

On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:59:52 +0200 (CEST)
Bodo Eggert <7eggert@....de> wrote:

> On Sun, 12 Oct 2008, Alan Cox wrote:
> 
> > > That is why I propose usage of real_tty in ioctl() handling:
> > > 
> > > case TIOCGWINSZ:
> > >                 return tiocgwinsz(real_tty, p);
> > 
> > Congratulations we've finally got there - and that is exactly the code in
> > the current tty tree.
> 
> These patches are missing from 2.6.27. There you have:
> 
>     case TIOCGWINSZ:
>         return tiocgwinsz(tty, p);

Yes I know. The rules for the stable tree are that it has to go upstream
first. It has not gone upstream so it cannot go into the stable tree yet.
As and when Linus takes the relevant changes I will send a set to the
stable tree.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/