[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081015151119.493ea13f.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:11:19 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, ying.huang@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm -v5] Separate atomic_t declaration from asm/atomic.h
into asm/atomic_def.h
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:47:19 -0600
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 03:54:50PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > I have a note here that Matthew has proposed a different way of doing
> > all this. I don't immediately recall the details.
> >
> > Can we get a refresh on all of that please?
>
> I didn't remember either, but having just reviewed my inbox from August,
> I said that all architectures basically use:
>
> typedef struct { volatile int counter; } atomic_t;
> #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> typedef struct { volatile long counter; } atomic64_t;
> #endif
>
> and that should just be put in <linux/atomic_types.h>.
>
> Roman Zippel did me one better and suggested just putting it in types.h,
> which works for me.
OK. Or we could do the usual include/asm-generic/atomic_types.h and
then architectures can choose to include that if it is appropriate.
Anyway the good news is that this concept is an addition to rather than
a replacement of this current patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists