| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20081015221947.GN15064@parisc-linux.org> Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:19:48 -0600 From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: mingo@...e.hu, ying.huang@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm -v5] Separate atomic_t declaration from asm/atomic.h into asm/atomic_def.h On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 03:11:19PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:47:19 -0600 > Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx> wrote: > > Roman Zippel did me one better and suggested just putting it in types.h, > > which works for me. > > OK. Or we could do the usual include/asm-generic/atomic_types.h and > then architectures can choose to include that if it is appropriate. > > Anyway the good news is that this concept is an addition to rather than > a replacement of this current patch. Um, no. Roman and I are against the creation of a new file. Just put the atomic_t definition in <linux/types.h>. -- Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists