[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081015153124.c560e97e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:31:24 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, ying.huang@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm -v5] Separate atomic_t declaration from asm/atomic.h
into asm/atomic_def.h
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:19:48 -0600
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 03:11:19PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:47:19 -0600
> > Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx> wrote:
> > > Roman Zippel did me one better and suggested just putting it in types.h,
> > > which works for me.
> >
> > OK. Or we could do the usual include/asm-generic/atomic_types.h and
> > then architectures can choose to include that if it is appropriate.
> >
> > Anyway the good news is that this concept is an addition to rather than
> > a replacement of this current patch.
>
> Um, no. Roman and I are against the creation of a new file. Just put
> the atomic_t definition in <linux/types.h>.
Well we've been glacially fartarsing around with this for sufficiently
long that any such alterations will be too late for 2.6.28.
I'll drop it all. Again.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists