[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1224145782.28131.27.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:29:42 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: vatsa@...ibm.com
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, brking@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: sched: only update rq->clock while holding rq->lock
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 08:02 +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 08:37:23PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Vatsa noticed rq->clock going funny and tracked it down to an update_rq_clock()
> > outside a rq->lock section.
>
> For the records, actually Brian King and David Kleikamp noticed this!
Thanks Brian and Shaggy!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists