[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081016023252.GA25969@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 08:02:52 +0530
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
shaggy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, brking@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: sched: only update rq->clock while holding rq->lock
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 08:37:23PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Vatsa noticed rq->clock going funny and tracked it down to an update_rq_clock()
> outside a rq->lock section.
For the records, actually Brian King and David Kleikamp noticed this!
--
Regards,
vatsa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists