[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48F704E6.2010409@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:09:58 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: el es <el_es_cr@...oo.co.uk>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Kernel version numbering scheme change
el es wrote:
>
> the scheme to be s.yy.ww.tt, that is :
>
> s - series, as it is now (freedom to Linus to declare a whole 'new generation'
>
> ;) if he wanted )
>
> yy - two (in a hundred years, three) digits of the year
>
> Now the interesting part begins which is
>
> ww - the number of the week of the release. This will be between 1 and 52 (53)
>
> tt - the number of the week of stable release. As above.
>
> It is:
> - most similar to the scheme used so far,
> - informative : the ww and tt numbers are the week numbers of when the actual
>
> release HAPPENED, not when it is predicted.
>
Which really sucks for dealing with future releases.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists