lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081017142610.GA19832@hack.voiplan.pt>
Date:	Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:26:10 +0100
From:	Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:	Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com>
Cc:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] init: Properly placing noinline keyword.

On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 08:17:33PM +0600, Rakib Mullick wrote:
>On 10/17/08, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 07:05:32PM +0600, Rakib Mullick wrote:
>>  > Here, noinline keyword should be placed between storage class and type.
>>
>>
>> Why?
>Because, scripts/checkpatch.pl warned with following warning:
>     ERROR: inline keyword should sit between storage class and type

Well, 'noinline' is different from 'inline'.

'noinline' is defined as:

#define  noinline                       __attribute__((noinline))

in include/linux/compiler-gcc.h. But 'inline' is a _keyword_ defined
by C standard. If checkpatch.pl complains about 'noinline', you should
fix checkpatch.pl. :)


-- 
"Sometimes the only way to stay sane is to go a little crazy."

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ