[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b9df5fa10810170717p36dcb4a9y4e74089069dea03c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:17:33 +0600
From: "Rakib Mullick" <rakib.mullick@...il.com>
To: "Alexey Dobriyan" <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] init: Properly placing noinline keyword.
On 10/17/08, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 07:05:32PM +0600, Rakib Mullick wrote:
> > Here, noinline keyword should be placed between storage class and type.
>
>
> Why?
Because, scripts/checkpatch.pl warned with following warning:
ERROR: inline keyword should sit between storage class and type
>
>
> > --- linux-2.6-stable.orig/init/main.c
>
> > +++ linux-2.6-stable/init/main.c
>
> > @@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ static void __init setup_command_line(ch
> > * gcc-3.4 accidentally inlines this function, so use noinline.
> > */
> >
> > -static void noinline __init_refok rest_init(void)
> > +static noinline void __init_refok rest_init(void)
> > __releases(kernel_lock)
> > {
> > int pid;
> > @@ -792,7 +792,7 @@ static void run_init_process(char *init_
> > /* This is a non __init function. Force it to be noinline otherwise gcc
> > * makes it inline to init() and it becomes part of init.text section
> > */
> > -static int noinline init_post(void)
> > +static noinline int init_post(void)
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists