| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1224345097.6770.1389.camel@macbook.infradead.org> Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 16:51:37 +0100 From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org> To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, joerg.roedel@....com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu, fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp, andreas.herrmann3@....com, joseph.cihula@...el.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org, tony.luck@...el.com, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] iommu-2.6.git tree On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 02:43 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Sure (I assume the "master" branch). Yes. I don't use branches in public-facing repositories -- it's much better just to have separate trees. > However, I already have a tree in -next called iommu. It is one of the > tip auto branches (auto-iommu-next) and is currently empty. So do I name > this one dwmw2-iommu, or has Ingo finished with the other one? I believe the plan is that Ingo has finished with the other one and we use the new one instead, yes. -- David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre David.Woodhouse@...el.com Intel Corporation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists