lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 19 Oct 2008 13:12:03 +0200
From:	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc:	iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	fenghua.yu@...el.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
	suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
	andreas.herrmann3@....com, joseph.cihula@...el.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] iommu-2.6.git tree

On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 04:30:43PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> As previously threatened, I've created an iommu-2.6.git tree:
> 	git://git.infradead.org/iommu-2.6.git
> 	http://git.infradead.org/iommu-2.6.git

Is there a specific reason why IOMMU stuff should go to Linus without
testing them in the x86 tree before? The DMA layer and IOMMU drivers are
an integral component of the architecture and patches for it are best
placed in the architecture tree instead of a seperate one, imho.

Joerg

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ