linux-kernel - Re: io resources and cached mappings (was: [git pull] drm patches for 2.6.27-rc1)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20081020122046.GA25152@elte.hu>
Date:	Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:20:46 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
Cc:	Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	dri-devel@...ts.sf.net, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: io resources and cached mappings (was: [git pull] drm patches
	for 2.6.27-rc1)


* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:

> that gets ugly very fast. I think we should not use atomic kmaps but 
> NR_CPUS _fixmaps_ with a per CPU array of mutexes (this is basically 
> atomic kmaps but without the preemption restrictions). We could 
> take/drop the mutex and statistically you'll stay on the same CPU and 
> wont ever contend on that lock in practice.

peterz pointed it out that we need to be careful with the TLBs in that 
case.

I think it's solvable: a small non-default special-case in switch_to() 
would invlpg any pending such page. (and no two such mappings could be 
held at the same time)

So as long as we dont leave the CPU we wont ever do TLB flushes, and the 
flush will be local even if we do.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/