linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/9] OpenVZ kernel based checkpointing/restart

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <48FC8C30.6040409@fr.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:48:32 +0200
From:	Cedric Le Goater <clg@...ibm.com>
To:	Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@...ibm.com>
CC:	Louis.Rilling@...labs.com, Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	Andrey Mirkin <major@...nvz.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] OpenVZ kernel based checkpointing/restart

>> I'm afraid that we are forgetting to take the best from both
>> approaches...
> 
> I agree with Louis.
> 
> I played with Oren's patchset and tryed to port it on x86_64. I was able
> to sys_checkpoint/sys_restart but if you remove the restoring of the
> general registers, the restart still works. I am not an expert on asm,
> but my hypothesis is when we call sys_checkpoint the registers are saved
> on the stack by the syscall and when we restore the memory of the
> process, we restore the stack and the stacked registers are restored
> when exiting the sys_restart. That make me feel there is an important
> gap between external checkpoint and internal checkpoint.
> 
> Dmitry's patchset is nice too, but IMO, it goes too far from what we

I think you are talking about Andrey.

C.

> decided to do at the container mini-summit. I think there are a lot of
> design questions to be solved before going further.
> 
> IMHO we should look at Dmitry patchset and merge the external checkpoint
> code to Oren's patchset in order to checkpoint *one* process and have
> the process to restart itself. At this point, we can begin to talk about
> the restart itself, shall we have the kernel to fork the processes to be
> restarted ? shall we fork from userspace and implement some mechanism to
> have each processes to restart themselves ? etc...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/