[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081020094441G.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:46:06 +0900
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To: dwmw2@...radead.org
Cc: joro@...tes.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fenghua.yu@...el.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com,
sfr@...b.auug.org.au, andreas.herrmann3@....com,
joseph.cihula@...el.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] iommu-2.6.git tree
On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 12:19:58 +0100
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org> wrote:
> The Intel IOMMU appears on IA64 too, and doesn't want to be developed
> and tested off in an x86-specific corner by itself. And I'm going to be
> looking at other generic things we can do to improve IOMMU-related
> performance, which will touch on other architectures too.
Any plan to replace the current rb tree algorithm that VT-d
IOMMU implementation uses with the bitmap algorithm that the rest of
the IOMMU implementations use?
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/4/250
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists