[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081020072520.GE12131@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:25:20 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Zhaolei <zhaolei@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] Breaks the redundant loop in kernel/marker.c
* Zhaolei <zhaolei@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > hm, could you describe the necessity of this patch some more? This has
> > the change to change behavior, which might even be a bugfix: is there
> > any chance that the closure-loop in the e->ptype != NULL branch does not
> > exit? Before your patch we'd continue the iteration - which _probably_
> > does not lead to any more matches (e->name is supposed to be unique).
>
> Because e->name is unique in list, we don't need to continue the iteration
> after matched.
> This is a cleanup.
ok - it's useful to point this out in the changelog. You can use the
"Impact:" header we started using recently:
Impact: cleanup, no functionality changed
See for example this upstream commit:
| commit 07454bfff151d2465ada809bbaddf3548cc1097c
| Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
| Date: Sat Oct 4 10:51:07 2008 +0200
|
| clockevents: check broadcast tick device not the clock events device
|
| Impact: jiffies increment too fast.
Mathieu, any objections against the patch?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists