linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] Improve TSC as a clocksource under VMware

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 21 Oct 2008 20:15:36 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	Daniel Hecht <dhecht@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Improve TSC as a clocksource under VMware

> FWIU from the code, even if  cpu A's TSC is just 1 tick behind that of
> cpu B, we increment the nr_wraps value.
> And the code expects that there are no wraps in TSC throughout the
> 20msec measurement window. 
> So IMO its fairly easy to fail this test.

Ok I think it would be better to enlarge the margin then to fix your
issue.

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/