[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081021181536.GI12825@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 20:15:36 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Alok Kataria <akataria@...are.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Daniel Hecht <dhecht@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Improve TSC as a clocksource under VMware
> FWIU from the code, even if cpu A's TSC is just 1 tick behind that of
> cpu B, we increment the nr_wraps value.
> And the code expects that there are no wraps in TSC throughout the
> 20msec measurement window.
> So IMO its fairly easy to fail this test.
Ok I think it would be better to enlarge the margin then to fix your
issue.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists