[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081022100337.GA13400@alberich.amd.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:03:37 +0200
From: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: remove superfluous dmi_ignore_irq0_timer_override
quirks
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 12:57:06PM +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> The problem should be solved with commits:
>
> x86: SB600: skip IRQ0 override if it is not routed to INT2 of IOAPIC
> x86: SB450: skip IRQ0 override if it is not routed to INT2 of IOAPIC
>
> IMHO it does not make sense to check within a dmi-quirk
> whether an early-quirk was applied. Boot sequence is as follows:
>
> acpi_boot_table_init() (it applies dmi-quirks)
> ...
> early_quirks() (detect bogus IRQ0 override)
> ...
> acpi_boot_init() (setup IO APIC)
>
> Thus with current code we will always get following warnings for
> Laptops that have this dmi_ignore_irq0_timer_override dmi quirk:
>
> WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c:1410
> dmi_ignore_irq0_timer_override+0x30/0x60()
> ati_ixp4x0 quirk not complete.
>
> ... just because the early-quirk (ati_ixp4x0) was not yet executed.
>
Hi Ingo,
How are chances that this patch will go into tip-tree?
I'd like to see this fix in 2.6.28.
Thanks,
Andreas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists