[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0810221500120.25498@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:02:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, fweisbec@...il.com,
sagar.abhishek@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
srostedt@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] ftrace: handle generic arch calls
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:43:14 -0400
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> > +if ($arch eq "x86") {
> > + if ($bits == 64) {
> > + $arch = "x86_64";
> > + } else {
> > + $arch = "xi386";
>
> ?
>
> > + }
>
> (how well was this tested?)
I've tested this with !CONFIG_FTRACE, CONFIG_FTRACE &
!CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE, and CONFIG_FTRACE & CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE. I did
only test this on x86_64, so that explains why the i386 was broken :-(
I'll boot up my i386 box, and start running the tests there too.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists