[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20081021.222020.05274832.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 22:20:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: randy.dunlap@...cle.com
Cc: greg@...ah.com, sfr@...b.auug.org.au, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for October 21 (printk format warnings)
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 22:11:16 -0700
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 22:07:54 -0700 (PDT) David Miller wrote:
>
> > From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
> > Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 22:01:42 -0700
> >
> > > What's the expected modifier for "size_t" to work on all arches?
> >
> > Put "%Z" in front of the output specifier you want to use,
> > for example %Zd for decimal and %Zx for hex.
> >
> > > Same goes for the result of "size_of()", what should we use there? Or
> > > are we just required to always cast things?
> >
> > Sizeof should use the same as above.
>
> I know that Alan recently merged a patch with %Zd instead of %zd,
> but the ANSI spec says to use %z, so I thought that we were going with
> that moreso than %Z... ??
I think you're right.
My old fingers must do %Z automatically because gcc a long time ago
didn't recognize %z and warned. That should be such an old gcc problem
as to be irrelevant these days.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists