[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6ffd69180810230421v1508664bgc6e454cde792154f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 04:21:09 -0700
From: "Robert Moss" <robert.von.moss@...il.com>
To: "Samuel Thibault" <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>,
"Robert Moss" <robert.von.moss@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Framebuffer issues in 2.6.26 with uvesafb and vesafb. Linux is about choice!
I also want to note, that I downloaded 2.6.27.3 and compiled, with
CONFIG_FB_VESA=Y, and still get excactly the same response as from
2.6.26
Thank you for the quick reply, I'm glad to hear that everything is
still supposed to work ^_^.
Ok on both 2.6.24 AND 2.6.26, i get the same thing from vga=ask then scan,
0 F00 80x25
1 F01 80x50
2 F02 80x43
3 F03 80x28
4 F05 80x36
5 F06 80x36
6 F07 80x60
Please select a number
and on 2.6.26 with vga=791 it says
Screen unavailable [or not found, im not sure] 317. (which i believe
is 0x317 = 791)
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 1:04 AM, Samuel Thibault
<samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org> wrote:
> Robert Moss, le Thu 23 Oct 2008 00:54:56 -0700, a écrit :
>> Anyhow, I noticed that vesafb is no longer a part of the kernel.
>
> That's not true. It works nicely on my laptop (though I don't get
> the native 1280x800 resolution).
>
>> vga=791 still gave a mode not found.
>
> Then that's a bug, which is a completely different thing. Could you
> check that the output of vga=ask and typing scan at the boot prompt is
> the same between 2.6.24 and 2.6.25/26 ?
>
> Samuel, who may want to try 2.6.24 to get his native resolution.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists