linux-kernel - Re: [bug #2] Re: [PATCH 00/35] cpumask: Replace cpumask

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49009639.3050603@sgi.com>
Date:	Thu, 23 Oct 2008 08:20:25 -0700
From:	Mike Travis <travis@....com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bug #2] Re: [PATCH 00/35] cpumask: Replace cpumask_t with struct
 cpumask

Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Friday 24 October 2008 01:20:25 Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> Thomas has started a -tip cross-build test, and there's massive
>> cross-build failures as well due to the cpumask changes:
> 
> Yes.  linux-next reported the same thing.  I've backed out various arch 
> changes for this reason.
> 
>> it seems to me that this commit is massively borked:
>>
>>   4a792c2: cpumask: make CONFIG_NR_CPUS always valid
> 
> Yep.  This is the big one I dropped.  There are a few others; Mike is just 
> porting the changes across to your tree now.
> 
> Cheers,
> Rusty.

Hi Ingo,

It would seem easier to back out previous patches and apply the replacements.
Does this work for you?

Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/