[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081023160610.GA8853@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:06:10 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bug #2] Re: [PATCH 00/35] cpumask: Replace cpumask_t with
struct cpumask
* Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:
> On Friday 24 October 2008 01:20:25 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Thomas has started a -tip cross-build test, and there's massive
> > cross-build failures as well due to the cpumask changes:
>
> Yes. linux-next reported the same thing. I've backed out various
> arch changes for this reason.
>
> > it seems to me that this commit is massively borked:
> >
> > 4a792c2: cpumask: make CONFIG_NR_CPUS always valid
>
> Yep. This is the big one I dropped. There are a few others; Mike is
> just porting the changes across to your tree now.
guys. I already spent hours integrating the "latest" of this stuff today
and established baseline quality for it on x86. I've dropped 4a792c2 and
pushed out a new tip/cpus4096-v2, please send append-only patches for
the rest of the changes.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists