linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/8] scheduler patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1224844151.27946.1.camel@twins>
Date:	Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:29:11 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, efault@....de, vatsa@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] scheduler patches

On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 12:26 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:

> > 6-8 29 work
> 
> Could we have a #9 that uses a no-fastpath-overhead min() method instead 
> of avg_vruntime? Maybe we can get away without that overhead?

Looking at that suggestion, maybe I'll redo 7/8 so at to not depend on
6/8 using min from the get-go and fixing that XXX as well.

Will have to poke at it a little.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/