lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:19:29 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
cc:	greg@...ah.com, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.27.3 usbcore] Move __module_param_call(nousb)
 toimmediately after declaration of nousb.

On Sat, 25 Oct 2008, Tetsuo Handa wrote:

> Hello.
> 
> I succeeded to produce this problem with 2.6.26 .
> Thus, at least, it is not a new bug introduced in 2.6.27 .
> 
> Greg KH wrote:
> > This really sounds like a compiler bug somewhere, reordering this
> > shouldn't "fix" this issue.
> 
> I think so too.

> Well, I'm getting more and more confused.
> It may be gcc3's bug, it may not be gcc's bug.

Why don't you simply look at the output from the compiler?  Either the 
.o file or else the intermediate .s file.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ