linux-kernel - Re: [Re: Linux 2.6.28-rc1] ACPI Warning (nspredef-0852)[...]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49035313.9080309@shaw.ca>
Date:	Sat, 25 Oct 2008 11:10:43 -0600
From:	Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
To:	Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
CC:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, lenb@...nel.org,
	fabio.comolli@...il.com
Subject: Re: [Re: Linux 2.6.28-rc1] ACPI Warning (nspredef-0852)[...]

Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Saturday, 25 of October 2008, Maciej Rutecki wrote:
>>> During suspend to ram I have this message:
>>>
>>> ACPI Warning (nspredef-0852): \_WAK: Return type mismatch - found
>>> Integer, expected Package [20080926]
>>>
>>> s2ram seems works OK
>>>
>>> dmesg, acpidump:
>>> http://unixy.pl/maciek/download/kernel/2.6.28-rc1_wak/
>> IMO it's yet another incarnation of
>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11822
> 
> If this is an outright violation of the ACPI spec, let me know (and if
> possible, please tell me the spec page).  This is the kind of thing I expect
> it would be a no-brainer to get Lenovo to fix with a BIOS update.

I don't think this is the same issue, but in both cases it looks like 
the BIOS AML code is wrong (just judging from the output, haven't looked 
at the dump yet). _WAK is supposed to return a package of 2 DWORD 
values, a bit field of conditions that occurred during sleep, and the 
effective S-state the system actually entered (section 7.3.7 of the ACPI 
3.0 spec). Presumably the BIOS is returning a single integer.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/