[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <y0m3aihx1kd.fsf@ton.toronto.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:47:30 -0400
From: fche@...hat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler)
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, lenb@...nel.org
Subject: Re: PATCH] ftrace: Add a C/P state tracer to help power optimization
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> writes:
> [...]
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> [...]
> @@ -427,6 +429,8 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> }
> }
>
> + trace_power_mark(&it, POWER_PSTATE, next_perf_state);
> +
> switch (data->cpu_feature) {
> case SYSTEM_INTEL_MSR_CAPABLE:
> cmd.type = SYSTEM_INTEL_MSR_CAPABLE;
> [...]
Is there some reason that this doesn't use tracepoints instead
of such a single-backend hook?
- FChE
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists