[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0810271610590.13777@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:13:21 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>
cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, lenb@...nel.org
Subject: Re: PATCH] ftrace: Add a C/P state tracer to help power
optimization
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>
> Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> writes:
>
> > [...]
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
> > [...]
> > @@ -427,6 +429,8 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> > }
> > }
> >
> > + trace_power_mark(&it, POWER_PSTATE, next_perf_state);
> > +
> > switch (data->cpu_feature) {
> > case SYSTEM_INTEL_MSR_CAPABLE:
> > cmd.type = SYSTEM_INTEL_MSR_CAPABLE;
> > [...]
>
> Is there some reason that this doesn't use tracepoints instead
> of such a single-backend hook?
Yeah, this should be converted to a trace_point. See include/trace/sched.h
for examples.
The users are in kernel/sched.c. Just add "trace_" in front of the names
to find the users. Then you can look at kernel/trace/trace_sched_switch.c
to see an example on how to hook into it.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists