[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081029130338.GA26282@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 14:03:38 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: replace BIO_VMERGE_BOUNDARY with
BIOVEC_PHYS_MERGEABLE
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 29 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>
>>>> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> * Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> does it have any dependency on:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] bio: define __BIOVEC_PHYS_MERGEABLE
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, they're independent. Defining __BIOVEC_PHYS_MERGEABLE will
>>>>>> be useful for the Xen changes I need to make in the wake of
>>>>>> Tomo's patch.
>>>>>>
>>>>> ok - applied to tip/x86/xen, thanks Jeremy! (also added Jens's
>>>>> Acked-by)
>>>>>
>>>> build failure, zapped it:
>>>>
>>>> fs/bio.c: In function '__bio_add_page':
>>>> fs/bio.c:443: error: implicit declaration of function '__BIOVEC_PHYS_MERGEABLE'
>>>>
>>> What patch(es) did you apply?
>>>
>>
>> the one i replied to (2/2), and which one Jeremy said was independent
>> of 1/2. Not so much it appears.
>>
>
> Sorry, miscommunication. I meant you should apply 1/2, and drop 2/2.
uhm, 1/2 changes bio.h. I'll let both patches alone for now ;-) Please
resend once the dependencies are sorted out.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists