[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081029130551.GB14648@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:05:51 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...ena.org.uk>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@....ac.uk>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...il.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...nel.org>, felipe.balbi@...ia.com,
eric miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Regulator RFC] da903x: Where should usb charge pump support go?
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 12:48:41PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> Mark Brown wrote:
> > For WM8350 this is implemented as a device-specific function in the
> > driver core which is then used by other drivers to export the
> > information to relevant subsystems.
> Seems a sensible option. Can always put a hwmon driver on top of that
> if people want the nice userspace interfaces etc.
If it's anything like WM8350 you'll end up with multiple things sitting
on top of it.
> That's probably me anyway (industrialio), it's stalled whilst I switch
> my test platform to this driver and isn't really suitable for this
Ah, yes - so it is.
> (unless someone wants to abuse the auxiliary adc inputs for general
> purpose stuff).
My experience suggests that at least some designs will want to do that
but if you go with the internal-only support with multiple clients they
can always write a driver on top of that if/when they need it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists