[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4907BCFB.8090600@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:31:39 +0800
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, rjw@...k.pl,
dipankar@...ibm.com, tglx@...uxtronix.de, andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] v3 rudimentary tracing for Classic RCU
Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Ported to 2.6.27 to ease testing, and fixed up the formatting a bit.
> I remember quickly scanning through one-line-per-CPU data to find
> problems with rcutree.c, but the expanded names are quite nice -- I
> had to brutally abbreviate to fit each CPU on a single line.
> And I agree that seqfile does work nicely for this.
>
> I am strongly tempted to suggest CSV format output with headers to
> allow the data to be pulled into gnumeric or oocalc -- this would
> make handling large numbers of CPUs much easier. (Quickly donning
> the asbestos suit with titanium pinstripes...)
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
>
Hi, Paul,
My patch is like an example, you do not need keep the
codes that I have wrote. you can rewrite all of it. these files
are only accessed by RCU guys, not users. and some file in /proc
is very simple but easy to be read: /proc/stat, /proc/loadavg.
Thanx, Lai.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists