[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1225269736.24095.50.camel@yhuang-dev.sh.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:42:16 +0800
From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATH -mm -v2] Fix a race condtion of oops_in_progress
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 02:34 -0600, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com> wrote:
>
> > Fix a race condition accessing oops_in_progress. Which may be
> > changed on multiple CPU simultaneously, but it is changed via
> > non-atomic operation ++/--. This patch changes the definition of
> > oops_in_process from int to atomic_t, and accessing method to atomic
> > operations.
> >
> >
> > ChangeLog
> >
> > v2:
> >
> > - Includes fixes from Andrew Moton.
> >
> > - Re-based on Matthew Wilcox's new atomic_t patch.
>
> hm, there are a couple of places now that do atomic_set(,1) - they
> should be atomic_inc(), correct?
I just translate "oops_in_progress = 1" to
"atomic_set(&oops_in_progress, 1)". I think this is the safest method to
do the translation.
Best Regards,
Huang Ying
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists